10 comments

  • buzzwords 2 hours ago
    Meta's survival is fascinating to me. They dumped money in VR, their AI is not as good as their competitors and now they are dumping money on this glasses thing. They keep on getting caught doing shady things too.
    • m11a 2 hours ago
      Says a lot about just how much money they’re raking in from core business.
    • sofixa 1 hour ago
      > their AI is not as good as their competitors

      That's irrelevant because their AI was never a product they sold.

    • watwut 2 hours ago
      I think it is the shady stuff that earns them money. They cant survive without that. The rest is a corporate hobby, basically.
      • bstsb 2 hours ago
        i think honestly it’s the opposite. it still confuses me why meta invested so much in their pointless experiments (think any of their AR ventures) when their main source of revenue was, and continues to be, their boring advertising on consumer apps
        • jorams 1 hour ago
          You call it "boring advertising on consumer apps", but that's exactly where all the shady stuff keeps happening.
        • PunchyHamster 25 minutes ago
          I think all their actions could be explained by "they thought it will be next great thing and it either wasn't or they stumbled hard"
        • watwut 1 hour ago
          > continues to be, their boring advertising on consumer apps

          That is where the ugly shady stuff is.

          > AR ventures

          That is the corporate hobby stuff.

  • janalsncm 2 hours ago
    Something doesn’t add up. According to what the article is saying about Meta’s help article, there is no price tier which allows unlimited conversation mode 720 hours/month. Even the highest paid tier can only get 15 hours.

    But the article says this is an on-device feature. So there should be no overhead to Meta at all, aside from them storing the conversations I assume.

  • kstrauser 2 hours ago
    Me: You know, these ugly creeper peepers could not possibly make me want them any less.

    A PM deep in the heart of darkness: Hold my creatine.

    • cyberax 2 hours ago
      Hey, the sky's the limit. The next version can also shock the user!
      • lostlogin 2 minutes ago
        Physically or psychologically?

        This platform will allow new opportunities - previously it was just organising a genocide, now you can have a first person view.

  • tushar-r 1 hour ago
    It's interesting that people seem to have forgotten/gotten over the whole Glasshole "rejection/anger" against Google glasses ~10years ago. Maybe it would have been more socially acceptable even back then if they hadn't made them look sci-fi and instead like regular glasses.

    Or is it just that we haven't seen Scoble using these in the shower? :-D [1]

    [1] https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/jwherrman/yes-you-can-w...

    • someonebaggy 8 minutes ago
      It was 10 years ago. Today's preteens were infants then. Today's university students were preteens. Today's parents of infants were university students. Things change. Time destroys everything.
  • hamburgererror 3 hours ago
    This kind of product should simply be banned, there's just so many things wrong.
    • khurs 2 hours ago
      Like all things, there can be positive use cases.

      For example, a musician would probably rather have the audience wearing recording glasses and actually watching then recording on phone and watching the phone screen.

      The 'creepy pick up artists' and other social media types have become synonymous with it unfortunately

    • drsalt 2 hours ago
      absurd to ban cameras but allow firearms
      • hamburgererror 2 hours ago
        I'm not in the US so firearms are not even a question for me.
  • verytrivial 2 hours ago
    I was shown a full page interstitial for Meta Starfire by Kylie the other day, and it wasn't even the good Kylie.

    I have doubts they know how to market these if I'm seeing this ad.

  • probably_wrong 2 hours ago
    Mild tangent: are there smart glasses out there without camera, without needing internet access, and with custom app support? All my neck and back want is a way for me to look up instead of down whenever I'm bored and smart glasses would be one possible solution for that.
    • tehlike 1 hour ago
      You can look for smart glasses (hey cyan) in aliexpress, and use claude/codex to reverse engineer. There's a guy who put an sdk on github. All you need is bluetooth to your phone, and of you go. You can build an app that does whatever you want within the firmware limitations of the glasses.
  • dmitrygr 3 hours ago
    > Meta’s rate limit is ridiculous. [...] feature [...] doesn’t use Meta’s servers. It runs on-device, using the chips inside the glasses [...] I turned off my internet, and it kept working.

    BMW heated-seats style move. Classy.

    • johanbcn 2 hours ago
      Well, of course it's getting rate limited behind a subscription. Someone has to pay for all the additional compute and storage required to datamine your conversations.
  • stavros 3 hours ago
  • Havoc 3 hours ago
    Doesn’t even have adoption yet? They’re skipping a couple of steps on the enshitification ladder here
    • ageitgey 3 hours ago
      They are actually selling really well. But sadly, they are selling because you can drill out the 'recording' indicator light and use them to secretly record people to make creepy TikToks.
      • jerojero 47 minutes ago
        That's not why they're selling.

        They're selling because people love to record other people, publicly, without shame. It's kind of like a go-pro, is the use case for these.

        The creepers exist but they're not enough people to build a business around.

      • kakacik 1 hour ago
        Thats a good candidate for a closed fist falling at non-walking speeds at somebody's ugly face. Do that around my kids and you are automatically a pedo that will get adequate treatment.

        Also, where I live its against the law to record people without their consent so if I would be feeling very nice I would just hold you against the ground till cops come.

        You wear them = you film with them. Get your shit together kids, this ain't some harmless fun.

        • Havoc 1 hour ago
          Seems likely that the cops would take action against you for assault more than filming
        • Hendrikto 1 hour ago
          It’s one thing to make a passionate speech on the internet. It is another thing to be charged with battery and assault.
          • PunchyHamster 22 minutes ago
            I mean technically if you do it for no reason (it not actually recording), they have no video evidence, and if they did actually record and use it as evidence, well, it shows you were in the right. Not sure what punishment is for creeping on someone's kid vs getting a slap in the face tho