15 comments

  • dtf 1 hour ago
    NATS - the same system that crashed in August 2023 [1] due to an id clash, causing 2000 flights to be cancelled and days of chaos.

    [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37461695

  • illwrks 1 hour ago
    For anyone stranded, read up on UK261/EU261 and your airlines application process to be reimbursed. As far as I’m aware it’s not likely to happen automatically, you need to initiate the process (and record audio/video just in case proof is needed)
    • ktallett 1 hour ago
      You won't get compensation for ATC issues, but you will be reimbursed.
      • d1sxeyes 5 minutes ago
        Yeah but I don't think it's that legislation you'd rely on: you paid for a service they didn't deliver.

        Compensation yeah, only applies if the reason for the delay/cancellation was under the airline's control. Nats down is pretty clearly a reason to reject compensation claims.

    • junofan 48 minutes ago
      Eh, I tried in 2017 with BA when their system went down and received nothing. There was magically a Black Lives Matter protest at Gatwick (or maybe LCY, can’t remember) on the same day, which isn’t covered apparently.
      • petercooper 12 minutes ago
        I believe the compensation part only kicks in if it’s the airline’s fault.
        • illwrks 8 minutes ago
          You may be right. As a direct result of the NATS issue perhaps not, but any second order issues once that is resolve you might be within scope.
          • d1sxeyes 1 minute ago
            Almost certainly not. The legislation says: "An operating air carrier shall not be obliged to pay compensation [...], if it can prove that the cancellation is caused by extraordinary circumstances which could not have been avoided even if all reasonable measures had been taken."

            That gets them off the hook for even second order effects. No harm throwing in a claim though, there's no penalty for having a claim turned down.

      • illwrks 11 minutes ago
        I think the qualifying rules may have changed since then.

        The legislation is on the link below, it might be worth a once-over with your chat bot of choice to understand out if your circumstances are covered:

        https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eur/2004/261/contents

  • PowPow619 6 minutes ago
    This brings up the ol' ATC government ran vs privatization debate
  • surgical_fire 25 minutes ago
    This affected flights going to the UK as well.

    Source: Me, stuck in an airport, having witnessed numerous flights destined to London canceled throughout the day.

  • somelamer567 2 minutes ago
    The timing is suspicious. We have two openly Fascist aggressors -- Russia and Israel -- who would want to attack us in a deniable but obvious way.

    My money is probably on Russia, since they are badly losing their criminal war of aggression on Ukraine and are running trolls on the internet right now to blame Israel and the Jews for their hybrid-warfare aggression against Germany these past few days.

    We are at war, folks. And the enemy doesn't fight Marquess of Queensbury rules.

  • johnnyApplePRNG 1 hour ago
    In the middle of a highly geopolitically sensitive moment where there's been bombs at other European airports recently?

    Color me suspicious.

    • heyitsmedotjayb 59 minutes ago
      Immediately after UK announced sanctions on illegal settlements...
      • tacheiordache 40 minutes ago
        Israel sabotagged Spain as well, I can’t believe how naive most people are in support of Israel
  • talhaanwar 31 minutes ago
    happen after every few years
  • varispeed 47 minutes ago
    IT sector in the UK is bargain basement. Most competent people left for countries where their talents are valued or retired.
    • ifwinterco 28 minutes ago
      It's fine for fintech etc, but air traffic control software yes I imagine not so much.

      Likely either outsourced or done by people who are comically underpaid considering how important it is

      • Cthulhu_ 16 minutes ago
        It's also huge amounts of code for very old standards
      • IshKebab 13 minutes ago
        You know there was someone who tried to refactor whatever code it was that broke here and was told it was too risky.
  • doublerabbit 1 hour ago
    Including mine. I'm not angry because my flight was cancelled. It's a pain in the arse but what really infuriates me is the "We are terribly sorry" these PR releases give. I've been on hold for three hours with British Airlines and it's "we are sorry", no you're not.

    "We are truly sorry for the ongoing flight disruption" is what infuriates the situation; when words have no meaning behind the phase. Pixelated hold-music I am sure is designed to make you rage further.

    • ryandrake 59 minutes ago
      Whenever a company communicates how "sorry" they are, I can't help but think about South Park[1].

      1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9u0EL_u4nvw

    • bcraven 2 minutes ago
      "Sorry for any inconvenience"

      What do you mean, it's ALL inconvenient!

    • Daviey 1 hour ago
      My wife is currently at Gatwick, supposed to have taken off 2 hours ago, but no update.... The frustrating thing is the complete lack of information. I cannot comprehend how nobody knows what the situation is. I mean, is aircraft on the tarmac yet? Has it left it's previous destination yet? etc.

      Worst part is, likely no compensation as it isn't the airlines "fault".

      • dylan604 1 hour ago
        Why the use of scare quotes? It's not their fault. The airline arranged for flight crew, had the plane available, yet something outside of their control is preventing them from doing the deed. It's no different to the airline if a sudden bit of weather came along preventing the flight from taking off.
        • donalhunt 56 minutes ago
          I think the frustration comes from airlines not being able to accurately predict what the impact of a delay will be for the schedule for the remainder of the day, following day. They always hope they'll be able to recover some of the schedule with fast turnarounds.

          On a recent trip (when I encountered issues on every leg — cancellations, delays, missed connections, you name it), it is clear that airlines are incentivised to not communicate delays until it is clear the delay can't be recovered. In one case, at the airline's hub, the airport displays were showing a 2 hour delay and their app showed on-time departure (to the point I had to go and ask which source to trust). Having been a frequent flyer in the past I was able to determine that the delay was likely (but airlines can swap in equipment at hubs and mitigate the delay).

          Once you do have a delay the ripples are complex to handle. You have some passengers that were meant to connect to other flights. You have some that won't travel at all die to the cancellation. You then have 100+ people who you somehow have to accommodate in the coming days when flight loads are hopefully already 90+%.

          To be fair to my airline, their app was actually great at offering me a rebooking option the following day when my flight was cancelled. Unfortunately, the option I selected resulted in a non-direct flight with a transfer time that was impossible in reality (shouldn't have been offered in my opinion). I was literally rebooked 5mins after they declared the flight cancelled, skipped the queues back in the departure area (I don't think the local service agents even knew about the app) and drove home to my family for an extra night.

          • ccppurcell 51 minutes ago
            I'm going to guess that they have really good predictions, it's just that it doesn't benefit them at all to reveal those to customers.
            • jdlshore 31 minutes ago
              Why would you guess that? “Prediction is hard, especially when it’s about the future.”
            • watwut 32 minutes ago
              Because making prediction and being wrong is way worst then not making one.

              Plus, imo, they dont know what exactly will happen. There is likely whole bunch of negotiations and replannings going on in background with unsure results.

        • Daviey 28 minutes ago
          Because nobody in this situation is accountable. I agree the airline may not be to blame for the cause, but SOMEONE is... but NATS do not carry the same responsibility.

          It blows my mind that consumers have lots of protection from the airline, but we have no protection from ATC failures.

          As it happens, flight just got cancelled.. so airline is responsible for hotel and rebook. Which is also unfair on them.

        • ljf 34 minutes ago
          In the UK we use quotation marks when we are quoting some verbatim.

          Scare quotes are an Americanism that is gaining traction her, but normally we use it for quoting speach.

        • chairmansteve 42 minutes ago
          The problem is that the airlines don't let you know what is happening. They deliberately keep you in the dark.
          • exe34 39 minutes ago
            If they told you, they might admit more than they actually need to be held responsible for, so no reason to go wasting shareholder value.
    • SoftTalker 36 minutes ago
      What would you prefer they say?
      • idle_zealot 31 minutes ago
        Completely utilitarian message. "Your flight #FLIGHTID (src -> dst @ time) is cancelled on account of REASON. For available flights click LINK. For reimbursement click LINK."
    • basisword 21 minutes ago
      What do you want them to say? It's an ATC issue. The airline don't know when it'll be fixed and can't do much until it is.
      • exogenousdata 10 minutes ago
        “We’re sorry, but our business model precludes timely responses in times of system stress.

        As a reminder, our shareholders are our primary concern (by law) and staffing trained humans to handle in customer support during unexpected surges isn’t something that can be supported while also funding the €0.05 per share quarterly dividend paid to British Airways share holders on June 29th of this year.

        We are not in a rush. If you’d like, try another airline. But they’re all the same.

        Beep.”

    • colechristensen 1 hour ago
      People will be angry regardless of what they say, some if they say they're sorry, some if they don't say they're sorry. Regardless of what they say, some set of people or another is going to come out and be angry about it.

      What do you hope to accomplish with the phone call?

      Failures happen, does it make a difference if there's someone in charge feeling a strong emotion about it? Do the call center staff have to feel genuine guilt as if their mediocre job somehow made them personally responsible?

      Being angry is just as useless as faking being sorry, all they're doing is acknowledging a screwup in an automated message. Give them a break.

      • alistairSH 53 minutes ago
        In the past year, I've flown for vacation twice, with delays on one leg of each.

        First one, United flight from IAD to SJU, 4-5 hour delay, mechanical issue, with updates from the gate agent every 45 minutes or so, basically keeping us well apprised of the status of our plane (and when that plane was no longer viable, of the replacement plane and then replacement crew). "Flight crew saw a warning light and needs to talk to company" then "company says try again" then "that didn't work, maintenance crew coming to look at it" then a few more similar updates. No, there was nothing we could do with the info, but it was nice to know the problem was being worked - at least made me feel less out of control.

        Second one, Aer Lingus from DUB to IAD, 4 hour delay, mechanical issue, no updates from the gate agent beyond "so sorry, we're delayed another hour" every hour or so. I found this much more frustrating. No, there was nothing I could do either way, but it would have been nice to know a bit more about what was wrong, who was working the problem, etc. This felt more out of control, and more frustrating.

        • dboreham 35 minutes ago
          You really only know for sure when the captain walks up the jet way and tells the assembled passengers him/her self.
          • alistairSH 22 minutes ago
            That's fair, but the United announcements had enough detail and were timed with obvious crew movement (flight, gate, mechanical), so all seemed plausible enough. Maybe they were just blowing smoke up our collective ass, but a few details make a difference (for me, at least).
      • lbriner 1 hour ago
        I suspect there is a name for thinking that, "if I do something, it will get resolved quicker". Lots of us won't just sit there and wait for someone to come and tell us when it is fixed because we don't trust that other people also want to resolve the problem.
        • blitzar 33 minutes ago
          Sounds like pedestrian push-buttons on crossings - satisfies people but it doesnt actually do anything.
          • tialaramex 11 minutes ago
            This is, at best, misleading. It is common that a junction running at capacity with a pedestrian phase will always run that phase with the same timing regardless of buttons, but that same junction (never mind other junctions) may often not be running at capacity, whereupon that pedestrian phase is inserted when demanded.

            Also of course outside of a junction the control system has no reason to stop the vehicular traffic if nobody demands to cross. So even in the middle of the day the only reason somebody who refuses to press the button can ever cross is that other people will press the button.

          • watwut 30 minutes ago
            It wont turn green unless you push it here. If you dont push it, you will stand there like an idiot until someone else comes and pushes it.
    • mcmcmc 1 hour ago
      Why wouldn’t they be sorry? It’s bad for them too
      • gspr 44 minutes ago
        Because only people who aren't actually sorry spend their time saying sorry instead of doing the one thing that would actually help people – provide detailed information on what the hell is going on.
    • ktallett 1 hour ago
      Do you expect them to employ enough staff to answer passenger calls for this rare occasion? That is not good business.
  • ghk-adsf 1 hour ago
    [dead]
  • matthew_morgan 41 minutes ago
    [flagged]
  • earth-tattoo 1 hour ago
    [flagged]
  • dude250711 53 minutes ago
    Better for the planet though.
    • Havoc 29 minutes ago
      Don't think so. The people will still need to fly and incidents like these mean lots of planes are out of place and may need to fly extra to reposition
      • tcfhgj 18 minutes ago
        most flights are not necessary
        • IshKebab 13 minutes ago
          Define "necessary". Good luck.
          • tcfhgj 5 minutes ago
            the flight doesn't contribute to preventing harm to anyone
    • w4yai 30 minutes ago
      Who knows. Maybe someone will decide to compensate with 2 flights instead of one.
    • dlcarrier 50 minutes ago
      Ocean liners use several times more fuel per passenger mile than airliners.
      • dewey 43 minutes ago
        Thats a bit of an odd comparison as they are in pretty different categories and don’t really compete against each other.
      • reaperducer 35 minutes ago
        Ocean liners use several times more fuel per passenger mile than airliners.

        So what? Two things can be bad at the same time. Nobody mentioned ocean liners except you. Why not bring up the greenhouse gases from landfills while you're at it?

        Whatabouting everything is so last decade.

        • monocasa 32 minutes ago
          Calling everything "whatabouting" when someone is just responding and expanding context to an existing comparison is what's actually last decade.
          • maxrev17 2 minutes ago
            Last decade is so last decade
    • TomatoCo 31 minutes ago
      What's the alternative?
  • foxwell_1959 1 hour ago
    Got me confused with that title, thinking what “100 seconds of flights” would look like.
  • small_model 37 minutes ago
    Wonder if any of this code was outsourced to India 'cut costs'
    • dv_dt 3 minutes ago
      Following neoliberal economic strategy has optimized for profit maxing over basic quality of life, let alone competency of building and operating complex systems. While the US is #1 in the trend, the UK is following pretty closely
      • maxrev17 2 minutes ago
        UK is a cesspit now